5 Ways The Universe Is Secretly Sabotaging Your Love Life

Few people go across life without at some degree having to face that soul-crushing topic “Why am I still single? ” The answers range from the painfully obvious — that “MAKE ME A SANDWICH” T-shirt isn’t endearing you to anyone, dude — to the utterly and cosmically inexplicable. Yes, sometimes it’s not you! And according to science, it’s sometimes surprising stuff, like …


According To Facebook, You’re 6 Percent More Likely To Be In A Relationship If You Share Dog Photos Instead Of Cat Photos

Look , not that we’re a bunch of crazy feline dames over here( we wholly are ), but felines are amazing. They’re ruthless murderers, they know how to use a litter container right out of the womb, you never “re going to have to” take them for walkings( unless you’re one of those people ), and they freaking evolved to talk to us. And once they’ve gets all that talking , not-walking, ruthless killing out of their systems for the working day, they are excellent cuddlers. What’s not to like?

A lot, if you’re in the habit of indicating them off on social media and don’t want to die alone.( Except for all the cats, naturally .)

For some reason, people seem to like puppies better overall, and it goes beyond pet predilection. It seems that if a potential significant other likes flaunting their felines online and has no puppies in sight, you’re 6 percent more likely to turn your nose up and move on. The folks at Facebook performed a study( read: they creeped on the profiles of 160,000 people ), and determined that 30 percent of people who shared feline photos were single, compared to only 24 percentage of dog-photo-sharing people. So maybe you have cats memes to blame for not getting specific actions between 2009 and 2013.

Perhaps not coincidentally, the Facebook researchers/ creeps also found that if you’re a cat person, you’re more likely to be into nerdy stuff like sci-fi and that weird phenomena known as “staying in and reading a book.” Dog folks, like their furry friends, are more likely to be outgoing and be full of something called “energy.” They’re also more likely to be into rom-coms and, highly weirdly, are the same love of Marley& Me .

Facebook You’d belief cat people would be more into the movie where the poorest of the poor puppy( spoilers) has to put up with Owen Wilson.

But don’t despair, feline folk. While your love life might be statistically more lacking, your friendships, while probably fewer in number, appear to be more fulfilling and meaningful than those of the dog fans out there. So, you know, suck it .

4 Says iPhone And Android Users Don’t Mingle( And A Broken Phone Screen Makes You Deeply Unsexy To Women )

We have a lot of things we look for in a potential partner — religion, politics, postures on perpetuating the species, how excited they are for the next season of Venture Bros , and so on. People use these things to determine compatibility with person or persons before sharing Dna with them, and rightfully so. After all, how can you expend the rest of your life with someone who has ideologies directly opposed to your own? Like, what if you get married, but then it turns out their phone isn’t exactly like yours ?

It might voice completely ridiculous( it is ), but this issue is a much larger foam noodle in the dating pond than one might suppose. According to a survey of 5,500 unhitched Americans, Android users are 15 times more likely to think less of iPhone users, and iPhone users are 21 times more likely to look down their noses at lowly Android consumers. Windows Phone users were presumably too busy submerge in sexuality to answer the survey results( just kidding, they don’t exist ).

SinglesInAmerica Apple fans will see this as further evidence that the iPhone has better performance.

Oh, and if you’re a shmuck who has the boldnes to own an older model? Then you’re an entire 56 percent less likely to catch a smooch sidekick. And divinities forbid you’re a dude with a cracked screen, because freaking 86 percentage of women will judge you more harshly for it. You complete wreck of a human being, you.

Like we said, this is ridiculous. We’d like to believe the human race isn’t so incredibly petty, but those are the raw numbers. Our advice? Let’s go back to judging people for the important material, like whether they load their toilet paper front-facing or not.


Pretty People Are Simply Not Hardwired To Be In Lasting Relationships, Says A Harvard Study

One of the fairy tales repeatedly jostle down our throats since birth is that pretty people get all the happy ends. The beautiful princess gets the handsome prince, and while some shenanigans might happen, they eventually go off into the sundown all happily ever after like. Meanwhile, somewhere in the background, all the plain( or just plain ugly) folks are shackled and shoved off into jail or something.

But not so fast, beautiful ones. In reality, your roguish good looks have doomed you to a life of singleness, or so claim some people from Harvard. In research studies titled Attractiveness and relationship longevity: Beauty is not what it is cracked up to be , researchers asked wives to rate the attractiveness of 130 celebrities and 238 regular schmucks. In both cases, it turned out that the subjects deemed more desirable were “more likely to divorce” and likewise “married for shorter durations.”( Hmmm, perhaps there’s a correlation between those two things ?)

The Independent “This couple didn’t even stay together past this photo shoot.” “Uh, we’re models.” “Exactly.”

But why would being good-looking construct you bad at relationships? Well, previous learns had found that when we’re committed to a partner, we assure other people as less attractive. This is your brain’s way of inducing sure you stick to your relationships. But the Harvard researchers believe that attractive people don’t have this “protective bias.” To demonstrate their hypothesi, they asked 130 people to rate the sexiness of someone of the opposite gender. And what do you are familiar with, the prettier raters were more likely to have the hots for the people the latter are rating, but “only if they( themselves) were in a relationship.” It’s like nature is pushing them got to go and share their beautiful DNA with as many people as possible, eventual legal costs be damned.

Of course , none of this information is as surprising as the fact that Harvard apparently has a whole wing to be given to Tinder Studies.


The State You Live In Can Significantly Affect The Quality Of Your Romantic Relationships, Claims A Nationwide Study

Love buds anywhere there are at least two warm bodies of the same species, right? From the frigid Antarctic to the harsh daily sauna that is the Sahara Desert, people will ever find ways to make whoopee. After all, everything there is comes down to a bunch of long-named chemicals. You’d think it wouldn’t matter where you were; you’re bound to find a willing participant in the dance of love.

Well, you’d be wrong, at the least partly. It turns out that, at least in the United States, it actually does matter where you live. In a nationwide examine be carried out in Michigan State University, it was find that if you live in the frontier region, the Mid-Atlantic, or the Northeast, you are more likely to have attachment avoidance or attachment nervousnes. Basically, this means that if “youre living in” more mountainous regions, you’re more likely to be of the recluse diversity, while living in or near metropolis stimulates you a bit clingier and likely paranoid that your bae will leave you for one of the many other possible baes in your area. So if you want to have a healthy relationship that’s generally free of standoffish or clingy behaviour, science says you’re gonna fare best in Mississippi, Utah, or Wisconsin. In such studies, those states were tied up for first place in a pleasant threesome of romantic satisfaction and health.

Meanwhile, North Dakota was deemed the worst nation for love …

Jennifer Z/ Wiki Commons And most things, generally speaking.

… must be accompanied by Kentucky, Kansas, South Dakota, Rhode Island, Ohio, South Carolina, Colorado, New York, and Indiana. But don’t worry, the authors of the study encourage readers not to move out of wherever they find themselves. In the conclusion, they country: “To a certain degree, positive relationships are detected everywhere and transcend period and place. After all, home is where the heart is.” Awwww .( But severely, get the hell out of North Dakota, specially if you’re planning to get old .)


Dating Apps Make You Imagine There Are Always Lots Of Potential Partners For You, So You Purpose Up Going For None( Or “The Paradox Of Choice” )

Ah, dating apps. It seems like no matter how many we sign up for , no matter how many people we’re is compatible with, we can’t seem to muster up the mettle to send a message. But what a bunch of good-looking nominees, right? We may be all alone now , but at any time, when we’re be prepared to get within touching distance of another human specimen, we could snag a date with a suave stranger and hitch a ride to romance town.

Well, guess what? It’s that very same perception that there are entire schools of fish in the sea that might be holding you back in the real world. As GQ editor Ashley Fetters says, “There’s an misconception of plentifulness. It induces it definitely sounds like the world is full of more single, eager people than it probably is.” She goes on to describe hitting it off with dudes at saloons, only to shy away when it is necessary to sharing numbers because she “could also just go on Tinder.” Sound familiar? It’s what psychologists call the paradox of option. In one famous experimentation, merely 3 percent of shoppers bought jam from a table provide 24 samples, while 30 percent bought jam from another table with only six samples. Online dating is kind of like that, merely with far less jam.

Oh, and it turns out our preoccupation with quickly judging a person based on their sexiness quotient isn’t exactly healthy either. A study by the University of Kansas been shown that constant swiping is messing up our ability to make real connections with other human beings. After dividing 130 people into three separate groups, they found that, essentially, after having an actual dialogue with person or persons, our perception of physical attractiveness goes up.

Tinder Side note: Why do all these studies pick 130 people? Has 69 been dethroned as “the sex number”?

So we’re back to some very basic advice that many of us are still reading: Stop judging people based on their lookings. Do that weird thing called “talking and seeing mutual interests, like perhaps you both actually can’t live without a dice bag and the special hardcover version of Xanathar’s Guide To Everything ” or something. Just go be people. We’ll be over here, encouraging you from our dank cat cave with the applause emoji on our shattered Android screens.

Friendly reminder that your cat doesn’t know what Valentine’s Day is and will just assume you’re venerating them as per usual if you get them a new cat tree .

If you adoration this article and want more content like this, support our site with a visit to our Contribution Page. Please and thank you .

Read more: http :// article_2 5357 _5-ways-universe-secretly-sabotaging-your-love-life. html

What do you think?

0 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%

When She Lost Her Dad, An Amazing Soldier Took Her To The Daddy-Daughter Dance

7 Serious Problems That Had Hilarious Cartoon Solutions